For the small firms that bid on public contracts

Draft tenders that already know what the buyer is grading you on.

Plyform pulls every question and mandatory requirement out of the tender pack into a compliance matrix, drafts each answer from your own past bids and policy documents, then scores the resulting draft against the buyer’s published evaluation weighting — so weak answers get repaired before the deadline, not after the decision.

  • Every answer scored against the buyer’s rubric, not a generic quality heuristic.
  • A content library you own that gets sharper every tender.
  • Priced in USD into the UK, US, Canada, EU and Australia.
  • Three tiers: one-off, monthly, or human-reviewed.

Buyer rubric

Cambridge City Council — Soft FM Services 2026

Draft v3
  • Q4.2Methodology
    5 / 5

    Describe the methodology for scheduling routine cleaning across three council-owned sites, including cover during staff absence.

    We schedule cleaning with a 4-week rolling rota, mirrored by a named backup operative on every shift. Cover is confirmed at the Friday sign-off and re-confirmed on the morning of service.

    Source in library
    15%
  • Q5.1Social value
    5 / 5

    Social Value Model: outline at least two measurable commitments against the Themes 2 (Skills) and 3 (Environment) outcomes.

    We commit to 120 apprentice weeks each year with a local FE college and to divert at least 92% of cleaning consumables from landfill through the council scheme.

    Source in library
    20%
  • Q7.3Insurance
    4 / 5

    Provide evidence of Public Liability cover of at least £10,000,000.

    PL cover held at £10,000,000 with Hiscox, certificate attached.

    Source in library
    10%
  • Q8.1Mobilisation
    3 / 5

    Mobilisation plan: describe site handover and operational go-live within 4 weeks of contract award.

    Site handover in week 1, deep clean in week 2, shadow run in week 3, full service week 4. Operational lead will be on-site at each handover.

    Source in library
    15%
  • Q9.4References
    2 / 5

    Two relevant references for contracts of similar size terminated in the last 3 years.

    Two references provided: City of York (HVAC and cleaning, £420k, 2022–2025) and Sheffield Hallam (cleaning only, £180k, 2021–2024).

    Source in library
    10%
Predicted weighted fit

How it works

Four steps, every tender.

Upload, compliance matrix, draft, score. Plyform runs the same loop on every bid — from a one-off Tender Pass to a monthly Studio month to a human-reviewed rewrite.

Every step is editable. The buyer’s rubric, not your copy.

Drop in your tender pack and your own library.

Plyform reads the buyer’s ITT, RFQ, RFP or framework mini-comp from PDF, Word or a portal share. We pull every single question, every mandatory response, and every weighted criterion into one compliance matrix — no manual transcription, no missed questions.

In parallel, you upload your past bids, case studies, policies, CVs and certifications once. We index them as a private content library that ships with your account, ready to draft from.

Scoring

Scored against the buyer’s rubric, not a generic heuristic.

Most generic AI tools score a draft against the wrong test — a model’s own idea of what a good answer looks like. Plyform reads the buyer’s published evaluation rubric from the tender pack and scores your draft against it: the same weights, the same criteria, the same thresholds the buyer will use.

Where a draft is weak, the report tells you exactly which question lost marks, what gap caused the loss, and which entry from your library closes it.

Compliance scoring — Cambridge City Council

Auto-scored, repaired

Weighted fit

78/ 100
+14 after repair

Plyform re-scored the draft after you answered Q8.1 and Q9.4 against the published buyer weighting. The two weakest sections were the ones we'd flagged before you submitted.

7 of 9 mandatory passes 2 needs evidence Weighted 100% by buyer
  • Technical & methodology88% · weight 40%
  • Social value outcomes92% · weight 20%
  • Mobilisation & risk64% · weight 15%
  • Insurance & compliance98% · weight 10%
  • References & case studies52% · weight 15%

The compounding content library

The longer you stay, the better it gets.

Every Tender Pass or Studio month writes a fresh answer into your private library — cited to the question and the buyer. After a handful of tenders, the library is detailed enough that a new bid drafts most of itself from your own past work, and every answer gets sharper with re-use. It is the moat Plyform gives you against cheaper commodity AI.

  1. 01

    Index once

    Upload past bids, case studies, policies, certificates.

  2. 02

    Draft from your work

    Plyform cites the source inside every answer.

  3. 03

    Submit, score, learn

    Score feedback and human rewrites fold back in.

  4. 04

    Re-use on the next tender

    Case studies compound across frameworks and mini-comps.

Pricing

Three tiers. Pick the one this tender needs.

Plyform sits below enterprise platforms like AutogenAI (around $30,000 a year with a five-seat minimum) and below UK intelligence tools like Stotles (£475 to £990 a month) — and above commodity AI by carrying evaluation rubrics built per procurement system and a content library that gets sharper with every tender.

Tender Pass

$79one-off

For the one-off bidder.

A single tender, end to end. Upload the pack, get the matrix, draft, score, submit.

  • One tender, one draft set, full scoring report
  • Read-only of your existing library if you have one
  • Email scoring report for offline review
  • No subscription — pay once, deliver once

Studio

Most common

$149per month

For the firm that bids every month.

Unlimited tenders, your compounding content library, every question learned from every tender you’ve written.

  • Unlimited tenders, one monthly invoice
  • A library you own; it gets sharper with every bid
  • Reuse of case studies across frameworks and mini-comps
  • Pricing feeds improve fit on common bid categories

Review

$1,500per tender

For the bid you cannot afford to lose.

A freelance bid writer reviews the AI draft end-to-end and returns a 48-hour human rewrite, line by line.

  • 48-hour turnaround by a senior bid writer
  • Line-by-line rewrite, not a polish
  • Library updated with your reviewer’s edits after the tender
  • Best paired with a Studio subscription

For your market

Rubrics built per procurement system, not per language.

Public contracts are local — the criteria, the marks and the weightings are different on every portal. Plyform ships with the five where governments publish the highest volumes of contract notices to small firms.

United Kingdom

UK

Contracts Finder and Public Contracts Scotland publish 50,000+ notices a year. Plyform ships with the Social Value Model weighted into every rubric.

£300bnawarded yearly

United States

US

SAM.gov micro-purchases, simplified acquisitions and best-value tradeoffs. Plyform reads your FAR-clause questions and flags the show-stoppers.

700k+opportunities listed

Canada

CA

MERX, BCBid and the new Trade Agreements. Plyform draws the CCDC clauses, CCAT schedules and provincial preferences into one matrix.

$235bnawarded yearly

European Union

EU

TED/Supplement to the Official Journal, multi-lingual requirements, CE marking and social criteria baked into the rubric.

27member-state schemas

Australia

AU

AusTender, state portals, Local Jobs First in VIC, Modern Slavery statements — all reflected in the buyer evaluation weighting.

AUD 80bnawarded yearly

FAQ

Common questions before you sign up.

Start with one tender

Try Plyform on the next RFP before you commit to a month.

Buy a single Tender Pass for $79, ship it on a real opportunity, and decide if you want a Studio month from there. No demo, no sales call — just a mailto.

Start a Tender Passplyform-emfauo@polsia.app

We reply within one business day, in plain English.